Graphicast Resources
Recent Blog Posts
Manufacturing Capacity Utilization is on a Steady 40 Year Decline. Will This Recovery Buck the Trend?
In looking at manufacturing capacity utilization trends over the past forty years, a sobering realization emerges. As expected, capacity drops during a recession. But for each recession, the ensuing recovery brings manufacturing to a capacity level lower or no greater than the peak preceding the recession. This trend continues, recession after recession. From a high of 89% back in January of 1967, capacity utilization is now at about 75%. In the last ten years, the highest it’s been is about 82%, in November of 2007. At the bottom of the current recession, capacity was about 68%, the lowest in the past forty years.
A very high capacity utilization rate can fuel inflation and lead to late orders and lack of agility; it is not necessarily a good thing. Surprisingly, a low utilization rate can be beneficial. Companies can be more responsive and agile to demand because they have the excess capacity available. However, this works only if you recognize the opportunity and have the means to put the capacity to use – cash for growth and skilled labor to run the capacity. For many small manufacturers, both are currently in short supply.
It will be interesting to see if US manufacturing can use the current low utilization rate to increase market share and improve agility. If it can, it will be bucking the trend of the last forty years. Such a reversal of the past would indicate that manufacturers are wisely looking at their market opportunities and manufacturing abilities, not just blindly playing a numbers game of cost reduction and capacity abandonment.
From the Field – Manufacturing is Ready to Roll
Graphicast participated in two trade shows last week, one in Marlborough, MA and the other outside of Toronto. That this was the first time we attended two shows at the same time is, in itself, an indication of the activity level in manufacturing. The view from the show floor was an even better indicator of the market. Both shows were very crowded, even over the lunch period, and the interest level was very high. This was not a week for just getting out of the office. Our reading is that manufacturing in New England and southern Ontario is coming back quickly, and with lots of energy. There is definitely interest in on-shoring production that had been sent overseas, and lots of new products ready to hit the market. We are following up on leads this week and will have all our sales people out of the office making calls; another sign of interest and a reboundin market.
We’re also seeing this rebounding in shipments. Our September shipments were the highest in two years. The only downside is the volatility of the activity. The trend is up year to year, but on a month to month basis we seem to be in the three forward, one backward mode.
The Power of Collaboration
Caterpillar recently highlighted how they reduced the cost of a component 20% by working with their supplier from the start of the design step. Graphicast has been pushing this concept for the past several years as we’ve recognized that designs coming to us later in the design process were not able to take advantage of all the features a casting can provide. By getting our customers working with us from the beginning, we can help them optimize their parts for manufacturing while still meeting the design specifications for function and performance. We offer our Design and Rapid Prototyping Service as a means to this end, and it has been very successful, with nearly half of our new customer projects starting out with a design consultation at the beginning of the design phase.
Graphicast Goes To Canada – Manufacturing Innovations – Medical
Graphicast will be exhibiting at the SME show “Manufacturing Innovations – Medical“, November 3 & 4 at the International Centre, Mississauga (Toronto) Canada.
Toronto is the heart of Canada’s medical manufacturing industry. Manufacturing Innovations – Medical is the Nation’s first focused event that connects medical manufacturers with companies that supply the technology and equipment they need to improve quality, innovation and speed to market.
Graphicast is excited to be hopping the boarder for the first time and participating in this show. To register for the show Click Here.
Governments – Stop Trying to Pick the Winners. Give Manufacturers a Stable Foundation.
Have you noticed the recent headlines on manufacturing? President Obama has been all over the Midwest, touting the latest high tech industrial start up. Senators and congressmen are becoming outspoken advocates for revitalizing our manufacturing sector. State and local governments are falling all over themselves offering incentives for companies to relocate to their particular area. Everyone wants to get in on the high tech or green bandwagon. Government officials love all this stuff. It makes great press. Unfortunately, it’s not great industrial policy.
Other than support for basic and applied research, governments have a terrible record in picking market viable technologies to support. These decisions are influenced by political winds that usually overlook the defining economics of an industry. Let the markets take the risk, not the taxpayer.
Some will argue that start ups are the source of most of the new jobs and that we need to support start ups to get out of the recession. However, a company that is already established and has a marketable product can add jobs much more efficiently if there is a place in the market for their increased output or new products. Indeed, conflicting analysis of Census data makes it easy to support either side of the argument about which firms create jobs – start ups or existing companies.
In the August 23 & 30, 2010 issue of Newsweek , an essay by three authors from McKinsey concludes that instead of trying to pick winners, government should focus on getting the basics right – stable laws and legal systems, efficient infrastructures, strong competition within sectors (no subsidies), transparency in regulated sectors, and providing workers with on-going education and skills needed for the 21st century.
Instead of a local official having a press conferences with a high tech entrepreneur who will create four or five jobs in the next year with his $1 million government grant, how about a press conference with a company that can create four or five jobs this month with a stable business environment and a $10 thousand training grant. It’s not as sexy, but it’s a lot more effective.

